1
0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-07-21 12:58:14 +00:00

bip3: Fix SPDX id of Open Publication License

This commit is contained in:
Tim Ruffing 2025-07-09 10:38:28 +02:00
parent e5748c9997
commit 85a248f68e

View File

@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ However, BIPs predating this proposal were allowed under other terms, and should
when no other license is granted: when no other license is granted:
* PD: Released into the public domain * PD: Released into the public domain
* OPL: [Open Publication License, version 1.0](http://opencontent.org/openpub/) * OPUBL-1.0: [Open Publication License, version 1.0](http://opencontent.org/openpub/)
## BIP Editors ## BIP Editors
@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ feedback, and helpful comments.
* PD: 42 * PD: 42
* CC0-1.0: 23 * CC0-1.0: 23
* BSD-3-Clause: 19 * BSD-3-Clause: 19
* OPL: 5 * OPUBL-1.0: 5
* CC-BY-SA-4.0: 4 * CC-BY-SA-4.0: 4
* FSFAP: 3 * FSFAP: 3
* MIT: 2 * MIT: 2
@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ feedback, and helpful comments.
and therefore CC-BY-SA-4.0 (and the GPL-flavors) is no longer considered acceptable for new BIPs. As mentioned and therefore CC-BY-SA-4.0 (and the GPL-flavors) is no longer considered acceptable for new BIPs. As mentioned
above, existing BIPs will retain their original licensing. above, existing BIPs will retain their original licensing.
Why are OPL and Public Domain no longer acceptable for new BIPs? Why are Open Publication License and Public Domain no longer acceptable for new BIPs?
* Public domain is not universally recognised as a legitimate action, thus it is inadvisable. * Public domain is not universally recognised as a legitimate action, thus it is inadvisable.
* The OPL is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications. * The Open Publication License is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications.