bitcoin/bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2026-05-25 17:09:34 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Monthly typo fixups

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: xiaobei0715 <1505929057@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wgyt <wgythe@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ragnar <rodiondenmark@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jon Atack
2025-04-17 15:46:10 +08:00
parent b60b886414
commit 8137279570
16 changed files with 21 additions and 22 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
bip-0099.mediawiki
View File

@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Fundamental disagreements and controversies are part of social
systems, like the one defined as the human participants in the Bitcoin
network. Without judging the motivation of the rule discrepancies or
what rules were in place first, we're defining schism[1] hardforks as
those in which - for whatever reason - users are consiously going to validate 2
those in which - for whatever reason - users are consciously going to validate 2
different sets of consensus rules. Since they will validate different
rulesets, they will end up following 2 different chains for at least
some time, maybe forever.
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ One possible result observed in the past[non_proportional_inflatacoin_fork]
is that one of the chains rapidly disappears, but nothing indicates
that this must always be the case.
While 2 chains cohexist, they can be considered two different
While 2 chains coexist, they can be considered two different
currencies.
We could say that bitcoin becomes bitcoinA and bitcoinB. The implications for market
capitalization are completely unpredictable,