bitcoin/bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-05-12 12:03:29 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

bip-0002: Mention OPL problems

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Luke Dashjr 2016-09-24 05:10:57 +00:00
parent f2e6bbd219
commit 70747425d8
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
bip-0002.mediawiki
View File

@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ BIP 1 allowed the Open Publication License or releasing into the public domain;
* The OPL is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications. * The OPL is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications.
* Many are unfamiliar with the OPL terms, and may just prefer to use the public domain rather than license under uncertain terms. * Many are unfamiliar with the OPL terms, and may just prefer to use the public domain rather than license under uncertain terms.
* The OPL license terms allowed for the author to prevent publication and derived works, which was widely considered inappropriate for Bitcoin standards.
* Public domain is not universally recognised as a legitimate action, thus it is inadvisable. * Public domain is not universally recognised as a legitimate action, thus it is inadvisable.
Why are there software licenses included? Why are there software licenses included?