bitcoin/bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-05-19 12:08:05 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

This BIP replace 79

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
nicolas.dorier 2020-05-28 08:39:49 +09:00
parent 387d5e1b12
commit 633f94d005
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 6618763EF09186FE
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
bip-xxxx.mediawiki
View File

@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
Layer: Applications Layer: Applications
Title: A Simple Payjoin Proposal Title: A Simple Payjoin Proposal
Author: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com> Author: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
Replaces: 79
Comments-Summary: No comments yet. Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-X Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-X
Status: Draft Status: Draft
@ -52,7 +53,6 @@ Another implementation proposal has been written: [[https://github.com/bitcoin/b
We decided to deviate from it for several reasons: We decided to deviate from it for several reasons:
* It was not using PSBT, so if the receiver wanted to bump the fee, they would need the full UTXO set. * It was not using PSBT, so if the receiver wanted to bump the fee, they would need the full UTXO set.
* The receiver was responsible to pay the additional fee, not the sender. * The receiver was responsible to pay the additional fee, not the sender.
* It was requiring at least one input to be contributed by the receiver.
* Inability to change the payment output to match scriptPubKey type. * Inability to change the payment output to match scriptPubKey type.
* Lack of basic versioning negotiation if the protocol evolves. * Lack of basic versioning negotiation if the protocol evolves.
* No standardization of error condition for proper feedback to the sender. * No standardization of error condition for proper feedback to the sender.